The Relationship between Spatial and Linguistic Intelligence with Mathematical Problem Solving Abilities

Rahma Hidayati Darwis

IAIN Bone, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.

Sufri Mashuri *

Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia.

Suradi Tahmir

Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.

Ahmad Talib

Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

There is emerging consensus that spatial intelligence and linguistic intelligence play fundamental roles in how individuals comprehend, express, approach, and solve mathematical problems. However, the underlying nature of this relationship remains challenging to grasp. Questions persist regarding how, why, and under what conditions spatial and linguistic intelligences are interrelated with mathematical problem-solving. This article addresses these questions through a literature review method, summarizing and synthesizing research from the fields of educational psychology and neuroscience. Findings indicate that spatial intelligence is associated with mathematical problem-solving. However, not all areas of mathematics have a consistent and strong relationship with spatial intelligence. In the findings of this article, a strong and consistent relationship between spatial intelligence and mathematical problem solving was found in areas such as geometry and algebra. As for linguistic intelligence, a fairly consistent relationship with mathematical problem solving ability was found. This may be because mathematical problem solving requires discursive skills, which are part of linguistic intelligence. The review concludes by considering the extent to which spatial and linguistic intelligence can be transferred to mathematical problem solving. Ultimately, this article aims to provide a more coherent and mechanistic explanation of the relationship between spatial and linguistic intelligences.

Keywords: Intelligence, spatial, linguistic, mathematical problem solving


How to Cite

Darwis, R. H., Mashuri , S., Tahmir , S., & Talib , A. (2024). The Relationship between Spatial and Linguistic Intelligence with Mathematical Problem Solving Abilities. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(6), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i61392

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Turğut, Melih & Süha Yılmaz. Relationships among preservice primary mathematics teachers’ gender, academic success and spatial ability. International Journal of Instruction. 2012;5(2).

ISSN: 1308- 1470

Rabab’h, Belal, Arsaythamby Veloo. Spatial visualization as mediating between mathematics learning strategy and mathematics achievement among 8th grade students. International Education Studies. 2015;8(5). DOI: 10.5539/ies.v8n5p1

Verdine, Brian N, dkk. Deconstructing building blocks: Preschoolers’ Spatial Assembly Performance 1 Relates to Early Mathematical Skills; 2013.

Hannafin, Robert D, Truxaw, Mary P, Vermillion, Jennifer R, Liu, Yingjie. Effects of spatial ability and instructional program on geometry achievement. The Journal of Educational Research. 2010;101(3) DOI: 10.3200/JOER.101.3.148-157

Gardner H. Intelligence reframed: Multiple Intelligences for The 21th Century. New York: Basic Books; 1999.

Armstrong T. Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD; 1994.

Gardner H. Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books, A Division of Harper Collins Publisher; 1993.

Hawes Z, Ansari D. What explains the relationship between spatial and mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2020;27(3): 465–482.

Available:https://doi.org/10.3758/ s13423-019-01694-7

Robertson SA, Graven M. Language as an including or excluding factor in mathematics teaching and learning. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2020;32(1):77–101 Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00302-0

Mix KS, Cheng YL. The relation between space and math: developmental and educational implications. Advances in Child Development and Behavior. 2012;42:197-243.

Davis B, The spatial reasoning study group. Spatial reasoning in the early years: Principles, assertions, and speculations. New York, NY: Routledge; 2015.

Lohman DF. Spatial ability and G. In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and assessment (pp. 97–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996.

Delgado AR, Prieto G. Cognitive mediators and sex-related differences in mathematics. Intelligence. 2004;32(1):25–32.

Tam YP, Wong TTY, Chan WWL. The relation between spatial skills and mathematical abilities: The mediating role of mental number line representation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2019;56:14-24.

Tolar TD, Lederberg AR, Fletcher JM. A structural model of algebra achievement: Computational fluency and spatial visualisation as mediators of the effect of working memory on algebra achievement. Educational Psychology. 2009;29(2):239–266.

McGee MF. Human spatial ability: Psychometric studies and environment: Genetic, Hormonal, and Neurological Influences. Psychological Bulletin. 1979;887-902.

Sitti Marliah T. Hubungan kecerdasan spasial dengan prestasi belajar matematika siswa. 2006;10(1):27-32.

Hawes Z, Sokolowski HM, Ononye CB, Ansari D. Neural underpinnings of numerical and spatial cognition: An fMRI meta-analysis of brain regions associated with symbolic number, arithmetic, and mental rotation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2019b;103:316-336.

Zacks JM. Neuroimaging studies of mental rotation: A metaanalysis and review. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2008;20(1):1- 19.

Jordan K, Heinze HJ, Lutz K, Kanowski M, Jäncke L. Cortical activations during the mental rotation of different visual objects. NeuroImage. 2001;13(1):143-152.

Mercer N, Howe C. Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 2012;1(1):12–21.

Available:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001.

Gervasoni A. The impact and challenges of early mathematics intervention in an Australian context. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuzniak, E. Simmt, & B. Xu (Eds.), Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-13 monographs) (pp. 115–133). Cham: Springer; 2018.

Dahar RW. Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Erlangga; 2011.

NCTM. Learning and teaching geometry, K-12. rseton, virginia: National Council of Teachers of mathematics; 2000.

Anderson J. Mathematics curriculum development and the role of problem solving. May; 2014.

Hendriani BF, Masrukan, Junaedi I. Kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan karakter mandiri ditinjau dari gaya kognitif pada pembelajaran matematika model 4K. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika. 2016;2000:38– 49.

Carvin A. MI and education: The Connection; 2000 Available:http//edweb.gsn.org/edref.mi.th..html

Battista MT. Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 1990;21(3):47-60.

Brown, Sally & Brenda Smith. Resource-based Learning,London: Kogan Page Limited; 1996.

Geary DC. Children’s mathematical development. Washington: American Psychological Association; 1996.

Hadamard J. The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1945.

Hegarty M, Waller D. Individual differences in spatial abilities. The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. 2005;121-169.