Evaluation of the Handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Capitalist and Socialist Countries: A Systematic Review

Agus Perry Kusuma

Department of Public Health, Dian Nuswantoro University, Jl. Imam Bonjol 207, Semarang-50131, Central Java, Indonesia Semarang, Central Java, Indonsia.

Slamet Isworo *

Department of Environmental Health, Dian Nuswantoro University, Jl. Imam Bonjol 207, Semarang-50131, Central Java, Indonesia Semarang, Central Java, Indonsia.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Background and Objective: The world was divided into two major ideologies of power, involving countries of socialist and democratic capitalism, which presented different ways of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. Each major power claims to be the best informed and resolute in handling the pandemic. In this sense, this study aims to analyze the success factors in coping with the pandemic in countries with capitalist and socialist government regimes.

Methods:  This study uses a systematic review of the literature, using the PICO strategy for the construction of the research question, the bibliographic search and the best available scientific information in the systematization.

Results: Summarize the main results described in Table 2, indicating how many articles presented better and worse results in socialist and capitalist countries.

Conclusion: Socialist countries, despite acting in a repressive and authoritarian way, had better results in facing the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to capitalist countries. Care is needed when interpreting these results, due to the risk of manipulation of information adopted in socialist countries, due to the control of the media and government bodies.

Keywords: Handling Covid-19, socialist country, democratic capitalism country, COVID-19 pandemic


How to Cite

Kusuma , A. P., & Isworo , S. (2023). Evaluation of the Handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Capitalist and Socialist Countries: A Systematic Review. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 41(4), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v41i4900

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zhao S. The US–China rivalry in the emerging bipolar world: Hostility, alignment, and power balance. J Contemp China. 2022;31(134):169–85.

Layne C. Preventing the China-US Cold War from turning hot. Chinese J Int Polit. 2020;13(3):343–85.

Ran Y. The Emergence of Postcolonial Apologia: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Chinese Governmental Response to Western Accusation During the COVID-19 Pandemic; 2022.

Tatlow DK. How" democratic security" can protect Europe from a Rising China; 2020.

Sayed AM. State and civil society in Egypt: 2011-2015. Rev Econ Polit Sci; 2020.

Bhattacharya N. Post Corona world: Who will win. Themat J Sociol. 2020;4(1).

Lim YJ. Nationalism Not Racism: President Trump’s Strategic Communication War Against China’s Coronavirus Propaganda. Texas Speech Commun J; 2021.

Samadov B. Azerbaijan—COVID-19 and a Divided Opposition. The COVID-19 Pandemic in the South Caucasus. 2020;12.

Grasse D, Pavlik M, Matfess H, Curtice TB. Opportunistic Repression: Civilian Targeting by the State in Response to COVID-19. Int Secur. 2021;46(2):130–65.

Phong NX, Van VH. The position and role of the vietnam political system in response to the Covid19 pandemic. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2021;7(11):2971–84.

Arbel Y, Arbel Y, Kerner A, Kerner M. Can the Regime Type (Democracy versus Autocracy) Explain the COVID-19 Recovery Rates? Chinese Polit Sci Rev. 2022;1–19.

Paras AY. An Evolutionary Institutionalist Explanation of the Philippines’ Militaristic COVID-19 Approach. Society. 2022;1–7.

Jiang J. A Question of Human Rights or Human Left?–the ‘People’s War against COVID-19’under the ‘Gridded Management’System in China. J Contemp China. 2021;1–14.

Serikbayeva B, Abdulla K, Oskenbayev Y. State capacity in responding to COVID-19. Int J Public Adm. 2021;44(11–12):920–30.

Akbari A. Authoritarian surveillance: A corona test. Surveill Soc. 2021;19(1):98–103.

Olufunto BO. The Curse Of Overlooking Secondary Consequences: The Covid-19 Example. Euromentor Journal-Studies about Educ. 2022;13(1):156–85.

Clarke EJR, Klas A, Dyos E. The role of ideological attitudes in responses to COVID-19 threat and government restrictions in Australia. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;175:110734.

Caratas MA, Spătariu EC, Gheorghiu G. Does Covid-19 threaten global democracy? Ovidius Univ Ann Econ Sci Ser. 2020;1:44–9.

Trein P. The paradox of prevention: Authoritarian past and liberal democracy in times of crisis. Available SSRN 3625523; 2020.

Jørgensen F, Bor A, Lindholt MF, Petersen MB. Public support for government responses against COVID-19: Assessing levels and predictors in eight Western democracies during 2020. West Eur Polit. 2021;44(5–6):1129–58.

Neilson D. Learning for the future beyond COVID-19: A critical alternative to the neoliberal model of development. Societies. 2022;12(2):32.

Arceneaux K, Bakker BN, Hobolt S, De Vries CE. Is Covid-19 a threat to liberal democracy?; 2020.

Ostrom V. Polycentricity: The structural basis of self-governing systems. Choice, rules and collective action: The Ostroms on the Study of Institutions and Governance. 2014;45-60.

Bandelow NC, Hassenteufel P, Hornung J. Patterns of democracy matter in the COVID-19 Crisis. A comparison of french and german policy processes. Int Rev Public Policy. 2021;3(3: 1).

Ejsing M, Denman D. Democratic politics in virulent times: three vital lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Distinktion J Soc Theory. 2022;1–23.

Eck K, Hatz S. State surveillance and the COVID-19 crisis. J Hum Rights. 2020;19(5):603–12.

Howard MC. Are face masks a partisan issue during the COVID‐19 pandemic? Differentiating political ideology and political party affiliation. Int J Psychol. 2022;57(1):153–60.

Wu C. Social capital and COVID-19: A multidimensional and multilevel approach. Chin Sociol Rev. 2021;53(1): 27–54.

Demertzis N, Eyerman R. Covid-19 as cultural trauma. Am J Cult Sociol. 2020;8(3):428–50.

Bieber F. Global nationalism in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Natl Pap. 2022;50(1):13–25.

Sørensen E, Torfing J. The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scan Polit Stud. 2005;28(3):195–218.

Alteri L, Parks L, Raffini L, Vitale T. Covid-19 and the structural crisis of liberal democracies. determinants and consequences of the governance of pandemic. Partecip e conflitto. 2021;14(1): 1–37.

San S, Bastug MF, Basli H. Crisis management in authoritarian regimes: A comparative study of COVID-19 responses in Turkey and Iran. Glob Public Health. 2021;16(4):485–501.

Xiao Y, Watson M. Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. J Plan Educ Res. 2019;39(1):93–112.

Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement. 2015;13(3):141–6.

Iannizzi C, Dorando E, Burns J, Weibel S, Dooley C, Wakeford H, et al. Methodological challenges for living systematic reviews conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic: A concept paper. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;141:82–9. 37.

Mathes T, Klaßen P, Pieper D. Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: A methodological review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):1–8.

Zaman G, Mahdin H, Hussain K, Rahman AU. Information extraction from semi and unstructured data sources: a systematic literature review. ICIC Express Letters. 2020; 14(6):593-603.

Rees EM, Nightingale ES, Jafari Y, Waterlow NR, Clifford SB, Pearson CA, Knight GM. COVID-19 length of hospital stay: A systematic review and data synthesis. BMC Medicine. 2020;18:1-22.

Wallis, Victor, and Mingliang Zhuo. Socialism, capitalism, and the COVID-19 epidemic: interview with Victor Wallis. International Critical Thought 10.2. 2020;153-160.

Lams L. Examining strategic narratives in Chinese official discourse under Xi Jinping. J Chinese Polit Sci. 2018;23(3):387–411.

Özmete E, Pak M. The relationship between anxiety levels and perceived social support during the pandemic of COVID-19 in Turkey. Soc Work Public Health. 2020;35(7):603–16.

Jackson JC, Caluori N, Abrams S, Beckman E, Gelfand M, Gray K. Tight cultures and vengeful gods: How culture shapes religious belief. J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021.

Lachapelle J, Levitsky S, Way LA, Casey AE. Social Revolution and Authoritarian Durability—ERRATUM. World Polit. 2021;73(3):592.

Cohen BMZ. Routledge international handbook of critical mental health. Routledge; 2017.

Jessen MH, von Eggers N. Governmentality and statification: Towards a Foucauldian theory of the state. Theory, Cult Soc. 2020;37(1):53–72.

Kagoro J. Competitive authoritarianism in Uganda: The not so hidden hand of the military. In: Democratization and Competitive Authoritarianism in Africa. Springer. 2016;155–72.

Petridou E. Politics and administration in times of crisis: Explaining the Swedish response to the COVID‐19 crisis. Eur Policy Anal. 2020;6(2):147–58.

Lindström M. The New Totalitarians: The Swedish COVID-19 strategy and the implications of consensus culture and media policy for public health. SSM-Population Heal. 2021;14:100788.

Watkins D V, Clevenger AD. US political leadership and crisis communication during COVID-19. Cogent Soc Sci. 2021;7(1):1901365.

Zuo X, Chen Y, Ohno-Machado L, Xu H. How do we share data in COVID-19 research? A systematic review of COVID-19 datasets in PubMed Central Articles. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22(2):800–11.

Yao L, Li M, Wan JY, Howard SC, Bailey JE, Graff JC. Democracy and case fatality rate of COVID-19 at early stage of pandemic: a multicountry study. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(6):8694–704.

Chathukulam J, Tharamangalam J. The Kerala model in the time of COVID19: Rethinking state, society and democracy. World Dev. 2021;137:105207.

Achim M-V, Văidean VL, Borlea S-N, Florescu DR, Muntean SN. Democracy and the Covid-19 pandemic. A cross-country perspective within cultural context. Int J Bus Soc. 2021;22(2): 546–73.

Greer SL, King EJ, da Fonseca EM, Peralta-Santos A. The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses. Glob Public Health. 2020;15(9):1413–6.

Nelson MA. The timing and aggressiveness of early government response to COVID-19: Political systems, societal culture, and more. World Dev. 2021;146:105550.

Buthe T, Barceló J, Cheng C, Ganga P, Messerschmidt L, Hartnett AS, et al. Patterns of policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in federal vs. unitary European democracies. Unitary Eur Democr (September 7, 2020); 2020.

Norrlöf Carla. Is covid-19 a liberal democratic curse? Risks for liberal international order. Cambridge Rev Int Aff. 2020;33(5):799–813.

Annaka S. The truth and myth of the advantages of authoritarian countries to COVID-19. 2021;

Dutta MJ, Elers C, Jayan P. Culture-centered processes of community organizing in COVID-19 response: Notes from Kerala and Aotearoa New Zealand. Front Commun. 2020;5:62.

Badran S, Turnbull B. The COVID-19 pandemic and authoritarian consolidation in North Africa. J Hum Rights. 2022; 21(3):263–82.

Kayı İ, Sakarya S. Policy analysis of suppression and mitigation strategies in the management of an outbreak through the example of COVID-19 pandemic. Infect Dis Clin Microbiol. 2020;2(1):30–41.

Gjerde LEL. From liberalism to biopolitics: Investigating the Norwegian government’s two responses to COVID-19. Eur Soc. 2021;23(sup1):S262–74.