Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies

  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions & Author Guideline- Rename
    • Accepted Papers
    • Editorial Policy
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewers
    • Printed Hard copy
    • Subscription
    • Membership
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Digital Archiving
    • Contact
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Publication Charge
  • Submission
  • Testimonials
  • Announcements
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2023 - Volume 38 [Issue 3]
  4. Original Research Article

Submit Manuscript


Subscription



  • Home Page
  • Author Guidelines
  • Editorial Board Member
  • Editorial Policy
  • Propose a Special Issue
  • Membership

Do Saudi Arabian Educational Policies Determine the Promotion of Creativity with Gifted Students?

  • Marwan Salamah
  • Marilyn Campbell
  • Christina Chalmers

Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, Page 25-41
DOI: 10.9734/ajess/2023/v38i3826
Published: 20 January 2023

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract


Educational policy plays a pivotal role in influencing educational practices in schools and can help promote creativity. In Saudi Arabia, however, few studies have focused on the analysis of these educational policies or on how they promote creativity with gifted students. Given that all schools in Saudi Arabia follow the educational policies issued by the Ministry of Education (MoE) and schools do not have separate educational policies or implementation documents to promote creativity, these policies could have a greater influence than in other countries where guidance is provided to schools on implementing national education policies. This study aimed to understand how the promotion of creativity is expressed for gifted students in Saudi Arabia by analysing educational policies issued by the MoE. To inform and guide the analysing of data, a 3Ps framework (Press, Process, and Person) was synthesised and used in the study. The findings identified two major gaps in the Saudi educational documents regarding gifted education for secondary school students. The first gap was the lack of a clear definition of creativity and giftedness, the relationship between creativity and giftedness, and the contradictions in defining creativity and giftedness. The second gap in these documents was a lack of detail about implementation mechanisms that could benefit teachers in schools. This study, therefore, suggests adding another (P) to the 3Ps framework for improvement, that is, promoting creativity in the educational context needs to include Policy, leading to four embedded circles of (P):  Policy, Press, Process, and Person.


Keywords:
  • Promote creativity
  • giftedness
  • gifted students
  • educational policy
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Full Article- PDF
  • Review-History

How to Cite

Salamah, M., Campbell, M., & Chalmers, C. (2023). Do Saudi Arabian Educational Policies Determine the Promotion of Creativity with Gifted Students?. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 38(3), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v38i3826
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

References

Amabile TM. Componential theory of creativity. Harvard Business School; 2011.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452276090.n42

Plucker JA, Beghetto RA, Dow GT. Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist. 2004;39(2):83–96.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1

Renzulli JS. Developing creativity across all areas of the curriculum. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.):Nurturing creativity in the classroom. Cambridge University Press. (2017). (Vol. 2, pp. 23–44.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n4p11

Runco MA. Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology. 2004;55:657–687. article. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502

Sawyer, K. (2015b). How to transform schools to foster creativity. Teachers College Record, 118(4):1–23.

Available:http://keithsawyer.com/PDFs/TCR.pdf

Sternberg RJ, Karami S. An 8P theoretical framework for understanding creativity and theories of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2022;56(1):55–78.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.516

Renzulli JS. What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan. 1978;60(3):180–184.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F003172171109200821

Renzulli JS. The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In S. M. Reis (Ed.):Reflections on gifted education. Prufrock Press. 2016;55–90.

Available:https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-00316-003

Treffinger DJ, Reis SM. Creativity and giftedness. Corwin Press; 2004.

King Abdulaziz and His companions’ foundation for giftedness and creativity (Mawhiba). Mawhiba Programs; 2022.

Available:https://www.mawhiba.org/En/Pages/default.aspx

Csikszentmihalyi M. The systems model of creativity: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer; 2015.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7

Treffinger DJ, Schoonover PF, Selby EC. Educating for creativity and innovation. Prufrock Press; 2012.

Marland Jr SP. Education of the gifted and talented. Report to the congress of the United States by the U.S. commissioner of education. U.S. Government Printing Office; 1972.

Available:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED056243

Luria SR, O’Brien RL, Kaufman JC. Creativity in gifted identification: Increasing accuracy and diversity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2016;1377(1):44–52.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13136

VanTassel-Baska J. The world of cross-cultural research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 2013;36(1):6–18.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212471451

Al-Hroub A. Gifted education in Lebanon: Re-examining the role of educational and learning capitals. Cogent Education. 2022;9(1):1–19.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2073644

Alamer S, Phillipson SN. Current status and future prospects of Saudi gifted education: A macro-systemic perspective. High Ability Studies. 2022;33(1):21– 44.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2020.1840966

Alamiri FY. Gifted education in Saudi Arabian educational context: A systematic review. Journal of Arts and Humanities. 2020;9(4):68–79.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v9i4.1895

Alfaiz FS, Alfaid AA, Aljughaiman AM. Current status of gifted education in Saudi Arabia. Cogent Education. 2022;9(1):1– 31.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2064585

Ismail SAA, Alghawi MA, AlSuwaidi KA, Ziegler A. Gifted education in Arab countries: Analyses from a learning-resource perspective. Cogent Education. 2022;9(1):1–7.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2115620

Rhodes M. An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappa International. 1961;42(7): 305–310.

Available:https://www.jstor.org/stable/20342603%0A

Piirto J. Creativity for 21st century skills: How to embed creativity into the curriculum. Sense Publishers; 2011.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-463-8_1

Richardson C, Mishra P. Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2018;27:45–54, article.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004

Craft A. Creativity across the primary curriculum: Framing and developing practice. Routledge; 2000.

Davies D, Jindal-Snape D, Collier C, Digby R, Hay P, Howe A. Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2013;8:80–91.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004

Harris A. Creativity, education and the arts. Palgrave Macmillan; 2016.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63661-0

Warner SA, Myers KL. The creative classroom: The role of space and place toward facilitating creativity. Technology and Teacher. 2009;69(4):28–34.

Available:https://gateway.library.qut.edu.au/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/creative-classroom-role-space-place-toward/docview/235272068/se-2?accountid=13380

Chan S, Yuen M. Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2014;12:69–77, article.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.003

Sawyer K. A call to action: The challenges of creative teaching and learning. Teachers College Record. 2015a; 117(10):1–34.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016146811511701001

Aljughaiman AM, Mowrer‐Reynolds E. Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2005;39(1):17–34.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.x

Beghetto, Ronald A. Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Prospective teachers’ response preferences. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2007;2(1):1–9.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.09.002

Sternberg RJ, Williams WM. How to develop student creativity. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD); 1996.

Beghetto, Ronald A, Kaufman JC. Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies. 2014;25(1):53– 69.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247

Cropley AJ. Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.):The Creativity Research Handbook. 1997;1:84–114. Ablex.

Hennessey BA, Amabile TM. Creativity and learning: What research says to the teacher. National Education Association; 1987.

Available:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED312835.pdf

Soh K. Creativity fostering teacher behaviour around the world: Annotations of studies using the CFTIndex. Cogent Education. 2015;2(1):1–18.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1034494

Bowers MT, Green BC, Hemme F, Chalip L. Assessing the relationship between youth sport participation settings and creativity in adulthood. Creativity Research Journal. 2014;26(3):314–327.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929420

Garaigordobil M, Berrueco L. Effects of a play program on creative thinking of preschool children. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2011;14(2):608–618.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n2.9

Glăveanu VP, Ness IJ, Wasson B, Lubart T. Sociocultural perspectives on creativity, learning, and technology. In C. A. Mullen (Ed.):Creativity under duress in education?. Springer. 2019;3:63–82.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2

Jamali B, Kazemi R, Shahbazi M. Effects of sport activities on increasing preschool children’s creativity. Management Science Letters. 2012;2(6):1975–1980.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2012.06.024

Marsh J, Plowman L, Yamada-rice D, Bishop J, Lahmar J, Scott F. Play and creativity in young children’s use of apps. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2018;49(5):870–883.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12622

Vygotsky LS. Play and its role in the mental development of the child. International Research in Early Childhood Education. 2016;7(2):3–25.

Available:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1138861

Yeh CSH. Exploring the effects of videogame play on creativity performance and emotional responses. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;53:396–407, article.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.024

Zachopoulou E, Trevlas E, Konstadinidou E, Group APR. The design and implementation of a physical education program to promote children’s creativity in the early years. International Journal of Early Years Education. 2006;14(3):279–294.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760600880043

Torrance ER. The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms—technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.; 1990.

Eberle RF. Developing imagination through scamper. Journal of Creative Behavior. 1972; 6(3):199–203.

Available:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ067371

Khawaldeh HMA. The effectiveness of SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among gifted and talented students [Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia]; 2018.

Available:http://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/2/s95521_01.pdf

Poon JCY, Au ACY, Tong TMY, Lau S. The feasibility of enhancement of knowledge and self-confidence in creativity: A pilot study of a three-hour SCAMPER workshop on secondary students. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2014;14:32–40, article.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.006

Wu TT, Wu YT. Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2020;35:1–9, article.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631

Daher W, Tabaja-Kidan A, Gierdien F. Educating Grade 6 students for higher-order thinking and its influence on creativity. Pythagoras. 2017;38(1):1–12.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v38i1.350

De Bono E. The CoRT thinking program. In A. L. Costa (Ed.):Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. Association for Supervision and Curriculum. 1985;203–211.

Available:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED262968.pdf#page=205

Hmeadat SRA. The effect of the cognitive research trust program for development of thinking skills on the achievement of the Jordanian English language learners. The Arab Journal of Sciences and Research Publishing. 2016;2(1):442–450.

Available:https://platform.almanhal.com/Files/2/85357

Ritchie SM, Edwards J. Creative thinking instruction for aboriginal children. Learning and Instruction. 1996;6(1):59–75.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)80004-1

De Bono E. How to have creative ideas: 62 exercises to develop the mind. Vermilion; 2007.

Kim KH. The creativity challenge: How we can recapture American innovation. Amherst, NJ: Prometheus Books; 2016.

Torrance EP. Can we teach children to think creatively? The Journal of Creative Behavior. 1972;6(2):114–143.

Available:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED061544

Treffinger DJ. Encouraging creative learning for the gifted and talented: A handbook of methods and techniques. Ventura County Schools/LTI; 1980.

Treffinger DJ. Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review. 1995; 7(3):301–312.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213375

Berdonosov VD, Redkolis EV. TRIZ evolutionary approach: Didactics. ScienceDirect. 2015;131:1105–1112, article.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.428

Chang YS, Chien YH, Yu KC, Chu YH, Chen MYC. Effect of TRIZ on the creativity of engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2016;19:112–122.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.003

Domb E, Miller J, Czerepinski R. Improve TRIZ teaching and learning by getting out of the classroom. Proceedings of the 10th ETRIA World Conference; 2010.

Available:http://www.aitriz.org/documents/TRIZCON/Proceedings/Domb-Miller-and-Czerepinski-Improve-TRIZ-Teaching-and-Learning-by-Getting-Out-of-the-Classroom.pdf

Fan J. Application idea for TRIZ theory in innovation education. 2010 5th International Conference on Computer Science & Education. 2010;1535– 1540.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2010.5593787

De Bono E. Six thinking hats. Penguin; 2017.

Ziadat AH, Al Ziyadat MT. The effectiveness of training program based on the six hats model in developing creative thinking skills and academic achievements in the Arabic language course for gifted and talented Jordanian students. International Education Studies. 2016;9(6): 150–157.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n6p150

Aiamy M, Haghani F. The effect of synectics & brainstorming on 3 rd grade students’development of creative thinking on science. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;47:610–613, article.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.704

Al Qararah A. The effect of using brain storming in teaching science in developing creative thinking skills for basic seventh grade students of tafila schools–south of Jordan. An-Najah University Journal for Research - Humanitie. 2014;28(4):668–706.

Available:https://repository.najah.edu/handle/20.500.11888/2456

Michinov N, Primois C. Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior. 2005;21(1):11–28.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.004

Kim M. A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly. 2016;60(2):102–116.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0016986216630607

Sternberg RJ. Creativity as a habit. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.):Creativity: A handbook for teachers. 2007;3–25. World Scientific.

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.148.5028&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Kaufman JC, Beghetto RA. Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology. 2009;13(1):1–12.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0013688

Runco MA. Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2003;47(3):317–324.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308598

Fasko D. Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 2001;13(3–4):317–327.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_09

Lucas B. A five-dimensional model of creativity and its assessment in schools. Applied Measurement in Education. 2016;29(4):278–290.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209206

Lucas B, Claxton G, Spencer E. Progression in student creativity in school: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments. OECD Publishing; 2013.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4dp59msdwk-en

Pantaleo S. Creativity and elementary students’ multimodal narrative representations. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. 2019;42(1):17– 27.

Available:https://search.informit.com.au/fullText;dn=123654102086002;res=IELIND

Amabile TM. Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Routledge; 2018.

Sternberg RJ. The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 2006;18(1):87–98.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

Esquivel GB. Teacher behaviors that foster creativity. Educational Psychology Review. 1995; 7(2):185–202.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212493

Guilford JP. Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 1967;1(1):3–14.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x

De Bono E. The cognitive research trust (CoRT) thinking program. In W. Maxwel (Ed.):Thinking: The expanding frontier. The Franklin Institute. 1983;115–127.

Alhusaini AA. Using the TASC model to develop gifted students’ creativity: Analytical review. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. 2018;6(3):11–29.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2018.78

Tseng KH, Chang CC, Lou SJ, Hsu PS. Using creative problem solving to promote students’ performance of concept mapping. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2013;23(4):1093–1109.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9230-8

Furnham A. The brainstorming myth. Business Strategy Review. 2000;11(4):21–28.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8616.00154

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977;84(2):191–215.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman and Company; 1997.

Kim KH, Chae N. Recapturing American innovation through education: The creativity challenge for schools. In C. A. Mullen (Ed.):Creativity under duress in education? Springer. 2019;215–233.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_12

Sternberg RJ. Creative giftedness is not just what creativity tests test: Implications of a triangular theory of creativity for understanding creative giftedness. Roeper Review. 2018; 40(3):158–165.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1467248

Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI. An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development. 1991;34(1):1–31.

Available:https://www.jstor.org/stable/26767348%0A

Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage; 2016.

Merriam SB. Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass; 1998.

The educational policy of Saudi Arabia (TEPSA) (4th ed.). Ministry of education in Saudi Arabia (MoE); 1995.

Available:https://www.moe.gov.sa/ar/aboutus/nationaltransformation/RPRLibrary/سياسة التعليم بالمملكة.pdf

The regulatory rules for gifted education in Saudi Arabia (TRRGESA). Ministry of education in Saudi Arabia (MoE); 2001.

Available:https://www.moe.gov.sa/ar/aboutus/nationaltransformation/RPRLibrary/القواعد التنظيمية لرعاية الموهوبين.pdf

The Arabic strategy for giftedness and creativity (TASGC). Mawhiba; 2008.

Available:https://www.mawhiba.org/Ar/About/who/Documents/arab-strat.pdf

Guide for gifted programs in schools (GGPS). Ministry of education in Saudi Arabia (MoE); 2009.

Available:https://edu.moe.gov.sa/Quriat/DocumentCentre/Docs/الأدلة/الموهوبين/دليل برنامج رعاية الموهوبين في المدارس لعام 1428هـ.pdf

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N. Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2015;12(3):297–298.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2021;18(3):328–352.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Xu W, Zammit K. Applying thematic analysis to education: A hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2020;19:1–19, article.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920918810

Hines ME, Catalana SM, Anderson BN. When learning sinks in: Using the incubation model of teaching to guide students through the creative thinking process. Gifted Child Today. 2019; 42(1):36–45.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518804858

Reis, Sally M, Renzulli JS. Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences. 2010;20(4):308–317.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012

Renzulli JS. Reflections on gifted education. Routledge; 2021.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003237693

Gallagher JJ. Political issues in gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 2015; 38(1):77–89.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214565546

Tomlinson S. Gifted, talented and high ability: Selection for education in a one‐dimensional world. Oxford Review of Education. 2008;34(1):59–74.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701542096

Rasmussen A, Lingard B. Excellence in education policies: Catering to the needs of gifted and talented or those of self-interest? European Educational Research Journal. 2018;17(6):877–897.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118771466

Pllana D. Creativity in modern education. World Journal of Education. 2019;9(2): 136–140.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n2p136

Wyse D, Ferrari A. Creativity and education: Comparing the national curricula of the states of the European Union and the United Kingdom. British Educational Research Journal. 2015; 41(1):30–47.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3135

Lassig CJ. Promoting creativity in education- From policy to practice: An Australian perspective. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 2009;229–238.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1640233.1640269

Lassig CJ. Creativity talent development: Fostering creativity in schools. In S. R. Smith (Ed.):Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific. Springer. 2021;1045–1069.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3021-6_49-1

Henriksen D, Henderson M, Creely E, Ceretkova S, Černochová M, Sendova E, Sointu ET, Tienken CH. Creativity and technology in education: An international perspective. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2018;23(3):409–424.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9380-1

Hennessey BA, Amabile TM. Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology. 2010;61(1): 569–598.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416

Sak U. About creativity, giftedness, and teaching the creatively gifted in the classroom. Roeper Review. 2004;26(4): 216–222.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554272

Saudi Vision 2030. National transformation program; 2022.

Available:https://vision2030.gov.sa/en

Mammadov S. Current policies and policy efforts for the education of gifted children in Turkey. Roeper Review. 2015;37(3):139–149.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1047548

McBee MT, Makel MC. The quantitative implications of definitions of giftedness. AERA Open. 2019;5(1):1–13.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419831007

Kim MK, Roh IS, Cho MK. Creativity of gifted students in an integrated math-science instruction. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2016;19:38–48, article.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.07.004
  • Abstract View: 63 times
    PDF Download: 33 times

Download Statistics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp
  • Telegram
Make a Submission / Login
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo


© Copyright 2010-Till Date, Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. All rights reserved.