Main Article Content
Testing is an inevitable issue in educational and psychological measurement and assessment. Over the years, several tests and testing mechanisms have been developed to assess different latent traits of learners or examinees. Of these testing forms, standardized achievement, aptitude and attitude testing have taken the forefronts in education, psychology, and research. Whereas these concepts are distinct, they, however, play similar roles which have been misconceived by many, especially those without expertise in educational assessment and measurement. The aim of this paper is to compare standardized achievement testing, aptitude testing, and attitude testing, using a narrative literature review approach. The paper provides a synthesis of gathered information that delineates conditions necessary for the utilization of each testing approach.
IZA DP No. 10356.
Nitko JA, Brookhart SM. Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited; 2014.
Allen MJ, Yen WM. Introduction to measurement theory. Illinois: Waveland Press; 2002.
Salkind NJ, Rasmussen K. Encyclopaedia of measurement and statistics (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007.
Nitko JA. Educational assessment of students. New Jersey: Prentice Hall;2004.
Anne A. Aptitude and achievement tests: The curious case of the indestructible strawperson; 1984.
Miller DM, Linn RL, Gronlund NE. Measurement and assessment in teaching. (10th ed.). New Jersey, NY: Pearson Education Upper Saddle River; 2009.
Schneider WJ. Principles of assessment of aptitude and achievement. H. S. Donald, C. R. Reynolds,SchweanV(Eds). The oxford handbook of child psychological assessment, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2013;286-330.
Banaji MR, Heiphetz L,Attitudes In FiskeST, GilbertDT, LindzeyG(Eds.). Hand book of social psychology John Wiley &Sons, Inc. 2010;353–393.
Fabrigar LR, Krosnick JA, MacDougall BL. Attitude measurement: Techniques for measuring the unobservable. In C. T. Brock & M. C. Green (Eds.), Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2005;17–40.
Haddock G, Maio GR. Attitudes: Content, structure and functions. In M. Hewstone, W. Stroebe, & K. Jonas, (Eds.), Introduction to social psychology: A European perspective. New Jersey, NJ: BPS Blackwell. 2008;112-133.
McClelland E. Measurement issues and validity tests for using attitude indicators in contingent valuation research. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2001.
Macklem LG. Aptitude: what it is, how to use it, and how to affect it. Manchester School System, Document Number: ED320914; 1989.
Cohen RJ, Swerdlik ME. Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018.
Heckman JJ, Kautz T. Fostering and measuring skills: Interventions that improve character and cognition. In Heckman JJ, Humphries JE, Kautz T(Eds.). The myth of achievement tests: The GED and the role of character in American Life,. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2014;341-430.
Vaughan-Jensen J, Adame C, McLean L, Gámez B. Test review of wechsler individual achievement test (3rd ed.). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2009;29(3):286–291.
Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE. How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw Hill Company; 2003.
Dudovskiy J. The ultimate guide to writing a dissertation in business studies: a step-by-step assistance. Retrieved from www.researchmethdology. net; 2018.
Ching G. A literature review on the student evaluation of teaching: An examination of the search, experience, and credence qualities of SET. Higher Education Evaluation and Development. 2018;12(2): 63-84.
Fink A. Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper, (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005.
Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;2001.
Rocco TS, Plakhotnik MS. Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Resource Development Review. 2009;8(1):120-130.
Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A. Writing narrative literature review for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2006; 5(3):101-117.
Rother ET. Systematic literature review × narrative review. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 2007;20(2):7-8.
Miles M, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1994.
Glaser BG. Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1978.
Downing SM, Haladyna TM (Eds.). Handbook of test development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2006.
Cronbach LJ. Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers; 1990.
Barlow DL. Educational psychology: The teaching learning process. Chicago: Moody Press; 1985.
Mehrens WA, Lehmann IJ. Using standardized tests in education (4th ed.). New York, N.Y: Longman Inc; 1987.
Seashore, HG, Wesman AG, Doppelt JE, Ricks J, Wallace W. Attitude, intelligence, and achievement. Test Service Bulletin. 1956;51:4-6.
Carroll JB. The aptitude-achievement distinction: The case of foreign language aptitude and proficiency. In D. R. Green (Ed), The aptitude-achievement distinction: Proceedings of the second CTB/McGraw-Hill Conference on Issues in Educational Measurement. Monterey, CA: CTB/ Mc Graw-Hill, Inc; 1974.
Levine AS. Aptitude versus achievement tests as predictors of achievement. Educational and Psychological Measure ment. 1958;18(3):517-525.
Quansah F. Traditional or performance assessment: What is the right way in assessing leaners? Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. 2018; 8(1):21-24.