Working from Home vs Learning from Home: A Critical Investigation and Analysis during the COVID-19
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies,
Page 23-29
DOI:
10.9734/ajess/2020/v12i330312
Abstract
The article aimed to make a critical investigation and analysis on working from home vs learning from home during the COVID-19. Small-scale research was conducted only targeting parents (having at least one school going child) to capture the view of how they deem the concept of working from home vs learning from home and whether there are any reservations among both concepts. The findings from the 36 respondents’ feedback suggest that parents often prefer working from home (wherever possible) but the same parent does not want their child to learn from home. The research shows that most parents believe remote working leads to higher productivity and leads to cost-effectiveness and remote learnings deteriorate creativity.
Keywords:
- Working from home
- learning from home
- work-life balance
- quality of life
- thinking paradox.
How to Cite
References
Hickman A, Robinson J. Is Working Remotely Effective? Gallup Research Says Yes; 2020. (Accessed 15 June 2020) Available:https://www.gallup.com/workplace/283985/working-remotely-effective-gallup-research-says-yes.aspx
Matthews D. How will technology reshape the university by 2030? Results from THE’s university leaders survey. Times Higher Education; 2018. Accessed 15 June 2020. Available:https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/how-willtechnology-reshape-university-2030
Mountney, R. Learning without school: Home education. 1st edition. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, 2009.
Freud S. The Ego, and the ID. General Press, India; 2020.
Adorno TW, Frenkel-Brunswick E, Levinson DJ, Sanford RN. The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Row 1950:228.
Allport GW. Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: H. Holt and. The company; 1937.
Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
Reed-Danahay D. Anthropologists, education, and autoethnography. Reviews in Anthropology, 2009;38, 28–47.
Srivastava K, Sethumadhavan A, Raghupathy H, Agarwal S, Rawat SR. To study the Indian perspective on the concept of work from home. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2015;8 (S4), 212-220.
Tustin, D. H. Telecommuting academics within an open distance education environment of South Africa: more content, productive, and healthy? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2014;15(3):185-214.
US Bureau of Labour Statistics. The American Time Use Survey (ATUS); 2020. Accessed 15 June 2020. Available: https://www.bls.gov/tus/
OWL Lab State of remote work. Accessed 17 June 2020. Available: https://www.owllabs.com/state-of-remote-work/2019
Thomas A, Pattison H. How children learn at home. London: Continuum International; 2007.
Fischer H. Heise L, Heinz M, Moebius K, Koehler T. How to identify e-learning trends in academic teaching: Methodological approaches and the analysis of scientific discourses. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 2015;12:31–43.
The University of the Potomac Online vs. Traditional Learning, 2020. Accessed 19 June 2020. Available: https://potomac.edu/learning/online-learning-vs-traditional-learning/
Islam N, Beer M, Slack F. E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education. 2015;3: 102–112. Accessed 15 June 2020. Available: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/10403/
Bell DA, Maranto R. Home Schooling in the 21st Century: Research and prospects. Routledge, UK; 2018.
Barratt-Peacock, J. Australian home education: A model. Evaluation & Research in Education, 2003;17:101–111.
Haidt J. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 2007;316:998-1002.
-
Abstract View: 1117 times
PDF Download: 631 times
