Main Article Content
The professional development of teachers most especially Philosophy teachers has been a major concern of the Government of Cameroon. The ministry of secondary education has experimented several approaches and methods such as the New Pedagogic Approach and the Competence Based Approach. However, the Problem-Solving Model (PSM) could have an influence on the professional development of secondary school philosophy teachers. On this premise, this study sought to find out how the Problem-Solving Model influences the professional development of secondary school philosophy teachers in Yaounde VI Municipality. The investigation was anchored on authors like J. Dewey, E. Kant, C. S. Pierce and K. Nkrumah on their constructivist and pragmatic views. The qualitative approach with the aid of a semi-structured interview and semi- structured observation were employed. A total of ten teachers were selected to participate in this study using the non-probability sampling technique from two secondary schools; G.B.H.S. Etoug-Ebe and G.B.H.S. Mendong in the Yaounde VI municipality. Data was analyzed descriptively using tables, graphs and thematic content analysis. The results revealed that PSM influenced the professional development of secondary school philosophy teachers except for some few elements like stating the problem, contextualizing and rephrasing the problem, recalling the problem and contextualizing the solution that need to be relooked into because teacher practices do not conform to Dewey’s pragmatic model. The results of this study led to the proposed pragmatic triadic model to guide teacher practices.
Ministry of Economy, Planning and Regional Development. Cameroon Vision 2035; 2009.
Martino PD, Zan R. “Me and Maths”: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 2010;13(1):27–48.
Skovsmose O. Travelling through education: Uncertainty, mathematics responsibility. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2008.
Borko H. Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher. 2004;33(8):3– 15.
Opfer VD, Pedder D. Conceptualising teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research. 2011;81(3):376–407.
Wu H. Professional development of mathematics teachers. Notices of the AMS. 1999;46:535-542.
Householder DL, Boser RA. Assessing the effectiveness of change to technology teacher education. Journal of Technology Education. 1991;2(2):16-31.
Hanley P, Maringe F, Ratcliffe M. Evaluation of professional development: Deploying a process-focused model. International Journal of Science Education. 2008;30:711-725.
Yoon KS, Duncan T, Lee SW, Scarloss B, Shapley KL. Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 033. Washington DC: US; 2007.
Inspectorate General of Pedagogy. Annual Report on the General Teaching and Learning across the Primary School Curriculum; 2004.
Lawhead WF. The Philosophical Journey, An Interactive Approach, (3rd Ed) New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
Stumpf SE, Fieser J. Philosophy, History and Problems, (6th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
CORD. Teaching science contextually. Waco, Texas: CORD Communications, Inc.; 1999.
Nebada HN, Nsoe MN, Komo LB. La Philosophie, Tle A B C D E, Nouveau Programme, Espagne: Le Presses de Graphique; 2008.
Fraser CA. Towards a unified model of professional development? Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen; 2005.
Achingale P. Gateway to western philosophy. Unpublished. Yaounde: Net Print; 2013.
Grossman PL, Wilson SM, Shulman LS. Teachers of substance: Very subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M.C. Reynolds. Knowledge Base for Beginning Teacher. New York: Pergamon Press; 1989.
Nkrumah Kwame. Consciencism: Philosophy and ideology for decolonization. London: Heinemann; 1964.
Peikoff L. Objectivism: The philosophy of Ayn Rand. New York: Meridian; 1993.
Foshay R, Kirkley J. Principles for teaching problem solving; 1998.
Savery JR, Duffy T. Problem-based learning. An instructional model & it's constructivist framework. Educational Technology. 1995;35(5):31-38.
Mayer RE, Wittrock RC. Problem solving. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (E- McDonald, S. E. (2009). A model of teacher professional development based on the principles of lesson study. Brisbane: Queensland University of European Research in Mathematics Education, Larnaca, Cyprus; 2006.
Dewey J. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: MacMillan; 1916.
Vygotsky LS. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1962.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
Mewborn DS. Teaching, teachers‟ knowledge and their professional development. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2003;45-52.
Mousoulides N, Philippou G. Students‟ motivational beliefs, self-regulation strategies and mathematics achievement. In H. L. Chick & J. I. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Melbourne, Australia. 2005;3:321-328.
Biesta GJ, Burbules N. Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield; 2003.
Rorty R. Pragmatism. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge; 2004.
Rosamond B. The political sciences of European integration: Disciplinary history and EU studies. In K. E. Jørgensen, M. A. Pollack & B. Rosamond (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of European Union Politics. London: Sage; 2007.
Morgan DL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007;1(1):48-76.
Amin ME. Social science research: Conception, methodology and analysis. Uganda: Makerere University Printery; 2005.
Stacy K. The need to increase attention to mathematical reasoning. In H. Hollingsworth, J. Lokan & B. Mccrave, (Eds.) Teaching Mathematics in Australia. Camberwell: ACER; 2003.