Main Article Content
The current study evaluates the potential of dynamic assessment (DA) in listening comprehension classes. DA is based on the sociocultural aspect of the Vygotskyan theory. It facilitates language improvement because DA assumes that mental instruments mediate psychological exercises. Although DA has been extensively analyzed, few studies have investigated its impact on listening comprehension in the language classroom. This study intends to fill the research gap in listening comprehension studies using DA as a mediation tool. The purpose of the current study therefore is to assess the effects of dynamic assessment on listening comprehension. A total of fifty-six English as a foreign language (hereinafter EFL) learners took part in the present examination. The subjects took a general placement proficiency test developed by the English Language Centre within the university to ensure participant homogeneity. The researcher recorded pre-test and post-test results of the participants and coded the values quantitatively. Data management and analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA to test reliability and validity. The relevance of DA in enhancing listening comprehension is clearly supported by the fact that DA students’ results outperformed their counterparts in the study. The study findings also indicated a need for language educators to utilise mediation techniques in order to enhance students’ listening skills. Educators are advised to apply more DA approaches to mitigate student resistance to classroom instructions. These discoveries underscore the efficacy of DA and suggest its inclusion in the language-learning curriculum.
Jaramillo JA. Vygotsky's sociocultural theory and contributions to the development of constructivist curricula. Education. 1996;117(1):133-141.
Ahmadi S, Donyaei S, Malek M. An investigation into the effect of interactionist versus interventionist models of dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL learners’ speaking skill proficiency. Teaching English Language. 2016;9(2):153-172.
McLeod SA. Lev Vygotsky. Simply Psychology. [Online]; 2018.
(Accessed July 22, 2019)
Saniei A. Dynamic assessment: A call for change in assessment. Asian EFL Journal. 2012;59:4–19.
Ahmadi S, Rozati F. Scaffolding versus non-scaffolding strategies impact on the EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research. 2017;110(5):447-456.
Hidri S. Developing and evaluating a dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in an EFL context, Language Testing in Asia. 2014;4(4):1- 19.
Shabani K. Dynamic assessment of L2 listening comprehension in transcendence tasks’. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;98(1):1729-1737.
Hashemi S, Ketabi S, Barati H. Dynamic assessment in EFL classrooms: Assessing listening comprehension in three proficiency levels. International Journal of Research Studies in Education. 2015;4(3): 73-89.
Alavi S, Taghizadeh M. Dynamic assessment of writing: the impact of implicit/explicit mediations on L2 learners’ internalization of writing skills and strategies. Educational Assessment. 2014; 19(1):1-16.
Farangi M, Kheradmand S. Dynamic assessment or schema theory: the case of listening comprehension. Cogent Education. 2017;4(1):1-13.
Ellis R, Li S, Zhu Y. The effects of pre-task explicit instruction on the performance of a focused task. System. 2019;80(4):38-47.
Hsu H. The combined effect of task repetition and post-task transcribing on L2 speaking complexity, accuracy and fluency. The Language Learning Journal. 2019;47(2):172-187.
Wang P. The effect of dynamic assessment on the listening skills of lower-intermediate EFL learners in Chinese technical college: A pilot study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2015; 6(1):1269–1279.
Ebadi S, Vakili S. Dynamic assessment of EFL learners’ listening comprehension via computerized concept mapping. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology. 2015;12(2):29-41.
Ebadi S, Saeedian A. Exploring transcendence in EFL learners’ reading comprehension through computerized dynamic assessment. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research. 2016;4(1): 27-45.
Philp J, Duchesne S. Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 2016;36(2):50-72.
Barabadi E, Khajavy G, Kamrood A. Applying interventionist and interactionist approaches to dynamic assessment for L2 listening comprehension. International Journal of Instruction. 2018;11(3):681-700.
Kamali M, Abbasi M, Sadighi F. The effect of dynamic assessment on L2 grammar acquisition by Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies. 2018;6(1):72-73.
Tayşi E. The effect of listening attitude and listening anxiety on listening comprehension: A regression model. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2019;7(2):356-364.
Shabani K. Group dynamic assessment of L2 learners writing abilities. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research. 2018; 6(1):129-149.
Ahmadian J, Tavakoli M, Dastjerdi H. The combined effects of online planning and task structure on complexity, accuracy and fluency of L2 speech. Language Learning Journal. 2015;43(1):41-56.
Phung L. Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context. Language Teaching Research. 2017;21(6):751-766.
Qiu X, Lo Y. Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use’, Language Teaching Research. 2017;21(6): 681-698.
Michel M, Sample E. An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in young learner’s oral task repetition. Canada Journal. 2014;31(8):23-46.
Richards JC. Basic Tactics for Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
Saslow J, Ascher A. Top Notch Fundamentals. London: Pearson Education ESL; 2015.
Ableeva R. The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening’. In L. J. P. P. M. E. (Ed.). Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages London: Equinox. 2008;57-86.
Emadi M, Arabmofrad A. Individual dynamic assessment: An analysis of Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension errors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2015;5(12): 2599-2605.