Main Article Content
Ministry of Education Malaysia is improving the quality of education by emphasising on quality of teacher’s leadership and their commitment. The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between distributive leadership practices and work commitments among the school leaders in Malaysia. In addition, the levels of distributive leadership practices and the level of work commitment among the school leaders was also studied. This study was carried out using a quantitative cross-sectional survey method using questionnaire as a research instrument of data collection. A total of 120 school leaders comprising principals, senior assistant teachers, assistant teachers and committee leaders were involved as respondents of this study. Two types of measuring tools used in this study were the Distributed Leadership Inventory (DLI) and the Teachers' Organizational Commitment Scale. The findings showed that there is a strong positive relationship between distributive leadership practice and work commitment. The findings also showed that the level of leadership of distributive leadership and work commitment are at high level. The findings also showed that there is no significant difference in distributive leadership practices and the level of commitment of school leaders based on gender factors. However there is a significant difference based on age and teaching experience. Thus, distributive leadership is critical to school leadership towards achieving the objectives of the Malaysian education as outlined in the Malaysian Education Blueprint (2013-2025).
Ministry of Education Malaysia. Annual Report 2016: Malaysia education blueprint.
Putrajaya; Kuala Lumpur; 2017.
Mohd. Najib Abdul Razak. Note from the prime minister. Annual report of the government transformation program. Prime Minister's Department of Malaysia; 2013.
Muhyiddin Mohd Yassin. Note from the deputy prime minister. Annual Report of the Government Transformation program. Prime Minister's Department of Malaysia; 2013.
DeMatthews D. Principal and teacher collaboration: An exploration of distributed leadership in professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management. 2014;2(2):176-206.
Fullan M. All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. California: Corwin Press; 2010.
Izani Ibrahim, Yahya Don. Servant leadership and effective changes management in schools. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2014;4(1):1-9.
Spillane JP, Halverson R, Diamond JB. Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2004;36(1):3-34.
Duignan P. SOLR Project: Contemporary challenges and implications for leaders in frontline service organizations, Sydney: Flagship for creative and authentic leadership, ACU National; 2003.
Coleman M, Earley P. Leadership and Management in Education. New York, Oxford University Press; 2005.
Harris A. Distributed leadership matters. Corwin Press; 2013.
Nurulaim Asyikin Zakaria, Suhaida Abdul Kadir. High school distributive leadership in Kangar district, Perlis. In: Graduate Research in Education Seminar (GREduc), Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia. 2013;131-136.
Yukl G. Leadership in organizations. (8th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Education; 2013.
Celep C. Teachers’ organizational commitment in educational organizations. National Forum of Teacher Educational Journal. 2000;10(3):1999-2000.
Bogler R, Somech A. Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2004;20:277-289.
Abdul Shukor Abdullah. Is cluster school a good school? Keynote address of National Faculty of Education Seminar on Education. University of Malaya; 2007.
Yahya Don, Yaakob Daud. School culture, transformational leadership and student academic achievement. Malaysia Journal of Learning and Instruction. 2012;9:111-138.
Spillane JP, Harvenson R, Diamond JB. Towards a theory of leadership practice: A Distributed Perspective. Chicago: Northwest University; 2004.
OECD. Education and training policy, improving school leadership. Policy and Practice, Summary in English. Paris: OECD. 2008;1.
Hulpia H, Devos G, Rosseel Y. The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teachers leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational and Psycho-logical Measurement. 2009;20:291- 317.
Jamallulail Abdul Wahab, Aida Hanim A. Hamid, Surayati Zainal, Md Fuad Md Rafik. The relationship between headteachers’ distributed leadership practices and teachers’ motivation in national primary schools. Asian Social Science. 2013; 9(16):161-167.
Shakir Firas Jalal, Issa Jinan Hatem, Mustafa Paiman Omer. Perception towards distributed leadership in school improvement. International Journal of Business and Management. 2011; 6(10):256-264.
Rosnarizah Abdul Halim, Zulkifli Abdul Manaf. Distributed leadership exploration study in Malaysia. Research paper proceedings of the 16th National Seminar on Management and Educational Leadership. Aminuddin Baki Institute, Genting Highlands; 2009.
Bahrin Mohd. Kassim, Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah. The practice of distributed leadership among school administrators. 6th International Seminar on Regional Education UKM-UR; 2013.
Bolden R. Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2011;13(3):251-269.
Hulpia H, Devos G, Keer HV. The influence of distributed leadership on teacher’s organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research. 2010;103(1):40- 52.
Humphreys E. Distributed leadership and its impact on teaching and learning. PhD thesis, National University of Ireland Maynooth; 2010.
Spillane JP. Distributed Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006.
William CG. Distributed leadership in South African schools: Possibilities and constraints. South African Journal of Education. 2011;31(2):190-200.
Yusof Boon, Yahzanon Tahir. Distributive leadership and its relationship with work stress and commitment. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education. ISQAE; 2013.
Hulpia H, Devos G. Exploring the link between distributed leadership and job satisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies. 2009;35(2):153-171.
Hairuddin Mohd Ali, Salisu AY. Distributed leadership and empowerment influences on teachers’ organizational commitment. Academic Journal of Interdisicplinary Studies MCSER Publishing. 2015;4(1): 163-174.
Nguyen Ngoc Du. The influence of distributed leadership on teacher organizational commitment: Initial evidence from Vietnam. Annual Review of Education, Communication, and Language Sciences (ARECLS). 2013;10: 69-90.
Creswell JW. Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Pearson new international edition. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited; 2014.
Azian, Mohd Izham. The practice of distributed leadership by the headmaster and its relationship with teacher job satisfaction in low-cluster SABK in Sarawak. Educational Research Seminar. IPBL, Kuching, Sarawak; 2017.
Marlia Jamail, Yahya Don. Distributive leadership practice and organiza- tional commitment based on teacher generation cohorts. Proceeding of ICECRS, International seminar on generating knowledge through research, UUM-UMSIDA, Universiti Utara Malaysia: 2016.
Norasmah Othman, Rofilah Md. Said. Daily high school teachers' readiness level practicing distributive leadership. Journal Teknologi (Social Sciences). 2013;64(1): 93–100.
Siva Rabindarang. Distributive leadership, organizational commitment and work stress at vocational colleges, Malaysia. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia; 2014.
Mat Zain Mamat. The relationship between the transformational leadership style of head teachers and the commitment of primary school teachers in Machang, Kelantan. (Unpublished Post Graduate Academic Paper): Universiti Utara Malaysia; 2013.
Zuraidah Juliana Mohamad Yusoff, Siti Noor Ismail, Yahya Don. The influence of distributive leadership on school environment. The Asean Journal of Knowledge Contribution. 2015;4(4):9- 1.
Goldman A, Tabak N. Perception of ethical climate and its relationship to nurses' demographic characteristics and job satisfaction. Nursing Ethics. 2010;17(2): 233-46.
Ilham Ismail. The influence of ethical leadership and job satisfaction on organizational commitment in schools. (Unpublished Doctoral Theses): Universiti Utara Malaysia; 2015.
Meyer JP, Allen NJ. TCM employee commitment survey academic users guide; 2004.
Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three component model conceptualization of organiza- tional commitment. Human Resource Management Review. 1991;1(1):61- 89.
Elmore R. Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington: The Albert Shanker Institute; 2000.
Siva Rabindarang, Khuan WB. Theoretical framework of the influence of distributive leadership on organizational commitment and work stress in technical and vocational organizations. Proceedings of 5th UPSI-UPI Conference on Education. Hotel Concorde Shah Alam, Malaysia; 2012.
Dampson DG, Havor FM, Laryea P. Distributed leadership an instrument for school improvement: The study of public senior high schools in Ghana. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research. 2018; 5(2):79-85.