Enhancing Class IX Students Participants in Group Work in Chemistry

Main Article Content

Dorji Penjor
Galay Wangchuk
Lam Dorji
Sangay Dorji
Choki Wangmo


This action research has investigated ways to enhance students’ participation in group work in chemistry. It is observed that Bhutanese students participate minimally in group activities especially in science. Most   Bhutanese students shy away from participating or interacting in the classroom. To enhance participation and interaction, the curriculum experts developed the curriculum considering the need of every students in Bhutan in science. Research in Bhutan found out that heterogeneous grouping is an effective way to maximize students’ success and collaborative learning is effective for meaningful learning and in solving problems. Some researchers found that in Bhutan science subjects are seen as difficult for both students and teachers. Through our experience of being science student, we saw that many students do not like to study Chemistry because they believe it is a difficult subject.

Aim of this study is to identify effectiveness strategies that teacher can use to enhance students’ participation in group work in Chemistry. This study was carried out with class IX students of Taktse Central School. We collected our data through observation and questionnaire. A tally was used to record their participation in the group such as the frequency volunteering to do presentation and taking initiatives in the group work. The data collection also involved survey questionnaire which consist of open ended questions.  Baseline data was collected and analyzed after which intervention strategies, such as allocation of group members and cooperative-learning methods was applied. After two months of the intervention process, post-intervention data was collected, analyzed and compared with the baseline data. The findings from this two sources reveal that students are more open for discussion and participation after the intervention process, and their initiative, contribution and understanding of contents increased. We were impressed by some student, who were usually quiet, shy and unsociable themselves to the teacher, became so close with us toward the end of our academic session.

Group work, action research, interaction, cooperative learning, taktse school

Article Details

How to Cite
Penjor, D., Wangchuk, G., Dorji, L., Dorji, S., & Wangmo, C. (2019). Enhancing Class IX Students Participants in Group Work in Chemistry. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2019/v4i430124
Original Research Article


Johnson B. Teacher - As researcher. ERIC clearinghouse on the teacher education. Washington DC; 1993.
(Accessed on March 18, 2018)

Maxwell TW. Action research for Bhutan. In the Rabsel: The CERD Educational Journal. 2003;3:1–20.

Raja N. The Effectiveness of group work and pair work for students of English at Undergraduate level in public and Private Sectors College. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business. 2012;4:155–163.

Wangmo T. Effective strategies for mixed-age classrooms. In the Rabsel: The CERD Educational Journal. 2005;7:5–12.

Rossin D. Hyland T. Group work-based learning within higher education: An integral ingredient for the personal andsocial development of students.” Mentoring and Tutoring. 2003;11(2):153-162.

Mahenthiran S. Rouse P. The impact of group selection on student performance and satisfaction. The International Journal of Educational Management, 2000;14(6): 255-264.

Bennet T. Group for the good. Spring project, American Educator. 2008;1–43.

Blatchford P. Galton M, Kutnick P, Baines E. Improving the effectiveness of pupil groups in classroom. ESRC Project Ref; 2005.
(Accessed on 12 April 2018)

Kriflik L. Resolving group work issues, University of Wollongong; 2006.
(Accesses on Feb 21, 2018)

Friedman L. Class participation - Talk in the class; 2010.
(Accessed on April 15, 2018)

Vygotsky L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.
(Accessed on march 15 2018)

Vygotsky L. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986.
(Accessed on 26 April 2018)
Available:www.s-f walker.org.uk/pubsebooks/pdfs/Vygotsky

Eggen P, Kauchak D. Educaional Psychology (8th.ed). Upper Saddle River, New Jerse, United States; 2010.

Seifert k. Sutton R. Educational psychology. Sweetzerland. ed (2nd). 2009;109–120.

Kounin J. Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1970.

Vasileiadou PD. An analysis of students’s communication during group wrok in mathematic. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges. 2013;60-62.

Kriflik L; Mulla J. Strategies to improve Students Reaction to group work. Journal of University Teaching and Learning practice. 2010;4(1) –27.

Rinchen S. Bhutanese girls’ perception of science and the impact of science on career choice. In the Rabsel: The CERD Educational Journal. 2012;3:17–44.